The Coming Local File Search Wars
Now that Google and other engines have indexed billions of pages on the Web, what's the next big frontier in search?

It is to bring that technology home by extending search to your local desktop. How many of us have multi-gigabyte hard drives now with hundreds, or even thousands of documents, images, spread sheets, and other files that we wish we could find in an instant? You know you took notes on a certain topic in a meeting with a client several years ago, but what was the name of that document? Where is it now?
Microsoft Windows provides a file search function, but if you've ever used its text search against a hard drive that contained thousands of files, you know how painfully slow it can be. Wouldn't it be nice if you could do a search for any keyword contained in any document or e-mail, and have all the best matching files appear instantly, ranked by relevancy, like Google does so well with Web documents? That's what Microsoft, Google, Ask Jeeves, HotBot, and others are all promising in the near future.
HotBot, owned by Terra Lycos, has fired one of the first shots in the local file search wars. HotBot Desktop is a free browser toolbar that promises to quickly search various types of documents and e-mail files on your hard drive. The tool is still in beta, so my first experience with it was not so positive. Fortunately, consumers should have multiple local search tools to choose from before the end of the year, with most of them expected to be free.
AskJeeves announced its acquisition this month of Tukaroo, Inc., a private desktop search company. Reportedly, this was in response to Google's plans to expand into local file search.
Microsoft has made it no secret that it plans to integrate high-speed local text search into the next version of Windows, code named Longhorn, and expected for release in 2006.
Consequently, Google has announced that it has been quietly developing its own local search tool over the past year, code named "Puffin."
Google even hired a former Microsoft Product Manager to help manage the development of the tool. A pre-cursor of that product may be Google's desktop search tool that can run in the Windows task bar rather than just the user's browser. The tool currently only searches the Web, but expect that to be extended to local file searching in the not so distant future.

Microsoft has announced plans to release a new local file search tool prior to the introduction of Longhorn. According to a recent New York Times article, this could happen before the end of this year. Microsoft has missing launch dates in the past, so my money is on Google's tool hitting the market first, at least as a beta.

How will Google profit from local file search? Presumably, it would be ad supported like its Web based search service, or in its more recently announced Gmail service. Gmail is a free e-mail service that scans your e-mail content for keywords and then tries to display ads relevant to your message's content. Not unexpectedly, this has led to concerns regarding privacy. However, for businesses looking for greater targeted advertising options, it could open up a range of new opportunities.

With the coming tools for indexing all the documents on your computer, the latest question is do you trust Google to have access to all of the information on your hard drive? If not Google, then whom? That's the question consumers and privacy advocates are now asking.

Access to your local files will be the next big battle ground fought over by the major search engines.

Google and others may have an uphill battle if Microsoft integrates its technology into the operating system and keeps it free of keyword scanning ads as with its many other tools bundled for free with Windows. That could give Microsoft the edge in the privacy battle. Microsoft will also be able to leverage its desktop monopoly to bundle its local search tool with every copy of Windows. This, combined with its greater knowledge and control of the operating system can be used to muscle out Google in the same way it did with Netscape in the browser wars. I admire Google for taking on Microsoft in the local file search arena, but I don't envy its uphill battle. The first thing I'd do is come up with a better code-name. A beast called the "Longhorn" sounds like it might spear Google's "Puffin" critter before it makes it out of the corral.
While you're waiting on the major search companies to introduce their own solutions, you might check out tools already available. DtSearch offers a product that is suppose to index your documents and provide fast local text search, but at a price tag of $199. There are probably others.

A tool I've used daily for over ten years for high-speed text search is Micro Logic's Infoselect. Unlike many Personal Information Managers (PIM's), this one is adept at letting you enter or import random, unstructured notes, addresses, documents, etc. to fill thousands of windows and folders. You can then search on any keyword or phrase contained anywhere in your free-form database. In an instant it will pull up all windows that match your search. I can find contact, business, or programming notes from years ago in an instant. It's reached the point where the program acts as my "second-brain" for any detail I can't remember.

Info Select is surprisingly useful for quickly storing and retrieving smaller, random bits of information most of us are flooded with everyday. However, it doesn't help in locating the larger quantities of data tucked away in Microsoft Word documents, e-mails, PDF's, spread sheets, and so forth. For that, you'll need a local full-text search tool that indexes all of your files for rapid retrieval. Fortunately, you should have plenty of low-cost, if not completely free, solutions from which to choose in the near future.




Link (Peter posted @ 20:31)

 
What is "organic" search and how can it help your company?
The first time I heard the term "organic search" I immediately thought of organic food at the grocery store. So, is this organic search healthier for me? Will it reduce my chances of getting cancer? Not only can the search engines bring most of the world's knowledge to my desktop, but now they can prevent deadly diseases too! Imagine my disappointment when I learned organic search was simply the next new buzzword for the concept of pure, or crawler-based search. As some of our readers may find it challenging to keep up with all of the latest lingo, I thought I'd take a moment to at least explain the concept of organic search.

Organic describes a search that returns results by indexing pages based on content and keyword relevancy. This is in contrast to listings ranked based on who paid the most money to appear at the top such as those on Overture.com. Sometimes this is called "pure" or "natural search" as it is supposed to be "untainted" by commercial payments or bids.

Historically, Google has led the way in championing the virtues of natural or organic search. Its primary focus has always been to return fast, highly relevant results based on the content of the page, the relevancy of links pointing to that page, and other "objective" criteria. Sponsored listings have always been clearly separated from the organic search results on Google. However, many other engines have experimented with mixing the two types of search without clearly labeling which is which. This has been followed by public outcries, and at least one cautionary set of statements issued by the FTC in 2002.

Pros and Cons of Organic Search vs Paid Search

Unlike organic foods at your local grocery store, you aren't required to pay extra to reap the healthy benefits of "organic" search. So what are the benefits of organic over paid search?

Pros:

Greater Click-throughs: People trust "organically grown" search results more than they do sponsored results. While the engines business is supported by paid ads, many consumers prefer the organic search results. Due to the contextual nature of organic search, the listings can be more relevant and offer a greater depth of choices. Therefore, while paid ads can play an important part in your marketing strategy, ultimately it is the organic search results that will more likely yield the greater click-through rates when all other things are equal. Therefore, it's this type of listing that will maximize the traffic to your site whenever you climb to the top.

Power of Branding: More and more large corporations are investing resources into organic search to gain the marketing benefits of promoting their brand. For example, most consumers would expect to find Dell.com in a search for computers. If your company does not show up for the keyword results in which you'd expect to appear it can be embarrassing. Consumers may wonder if Company X is as important as they once were if they don't even show up in MSN, Yahoo or Google. Conversely, inserting your brand in the top search results can give the impression that your company is important. Therefore, smaller companies can give the impression of big business importance by securing aa better position in organic search than their larger rivals.

Greater Trust Equals Greater Conversions: Most adults learn to apply a healthy dose of skepticism when they see a commercial on TV, a banner ad on the Web, or a sponsored ad on a search engine. After all, we know those ads are commercially motivated and may not always be the most relevant product or solution for our needs. It may simply represent the company that was able to spend the most money to get their message in front of me. Sometimes bigger companies do offer the best products, but there's no guarantee. There's certainly not the same level of trust that we see from visitors arriving from organic search. Organic search can, of course, be commercially influenced. However, a recent survey shows that people tend to trust organic results compared to sponsored listings. On the whole, you should see more visitors from organic search converting to sales, assuming your rankings were for targeted, relevant keywords. In the business world, ROI, or Return On Investment, is king. Fortunately, organic search can give you the high ROI you're looking for or your boss is demanding.

Organic is Free: After all these years, it's still free to submit to Google, arguably the most popular of the organic search engines right now. Google has always been adamant about not charging for inclusion in its index of 4.2 billion pages. Most other organic engines will also index you for free, although some like Yahoo do have paid inclusion options. Paid inclusion simply guarantees your page will get indexed quickly and stay indexed for as long as you maintain your subscription, but does not promise a particular ranking. However, if you have a Web site with good quality content and links from third party sites, paid inclusion is "nice-to-have". It can be very useful in getting pages indexed or re-indexed quickly. This allows you to quickly test various page designs and to feed news and other time-sensitive content to the search engine as quickly as possible.
Cons:

Organic Rankings are Not Automatic: With organic listings, you cannot simply hand over a certain amount of money and be guaranteed to quickly and automatically achieve any ranking you desire. Instead, achieving positions in organic search requires the proper technology, skill, and know-how. There has always been a cloud of mystery around the process of achieving top rankings. How's it done? Where do I start? That's why resources like this newsletter and products like WebPosition Gold are essential to a business's success in search engine marketing.

Organic Rankings Require an Investment in Time: The age-old adage of "nothing worthwhile in life ever comes easy" rings true with organic rankings. While they are monetarily free, simply submitting your pages to the search engines is not enough to bring in a flood of new visitors to your Web site. Far too many businesses have been fooled into spending $49 or $99 to submit their site to "thousands" of sites, 99% of which are obscure names you've probably never heard of. The key is that someone doing a search on a major search engine must be able to easily find your Web site.
If your site is buried at the bottom of the list, or simply fails to appear in the first few pages of search results, you can kiss your chances of being found good-bye. The key is to use responsible best practices to create pages that are highly relevant to the keywords that apply to your Web site and the products or solutions you have to offer. . In other words, optimize your pages for search engine visibility and see how fast your position improves. To do this, you simply need to know what each search engine needs for maximum visibility. Then tweak your Web page's content while paying attention to off-page factors like the number and type of links coming to your page. Tune the pages of your site to the preferences of the major search engines and then watch your rankings and traffic climb.

While optimizing your Web site to rank well for organic searches takes more effort than simply buying an ad, it can provide your business with one of the highest ROI results that you're likely to find. Numerous studies have placed search engine optimization at the top of the list of the most effective forms of online marketing. Its low cost, high relevancy, and high conversion rates make it an ideal marketing vehicle for almost any business.

The catch? As with any area of marketing, SEO is a competitive field. Arming yourself with the best technology and knowledge is key to gaining a competitive advantage. Long-time readers of MarketPosition know that WebPosition was the first product on the market to track a Web site's rankings on the search engines and to help improve those rankings. That early lead has given WebPosition more time for its technology to grow and mature than any of its competition. WebPosition's Page Critic module contains a wealth of advice and statistics designed to move your site to the top of the organic search results. Not only that, it also tracks your rankings and gives you advice on how to achieve the best results in both organic and pay-per-click search engines as well. Therefore, you can capitalize on the best of both worlds.
Link (Peter posted @ 20:17)

 
Bitacoras.com : A�adir bit�cora al directorio .
Ping
Bitacoras.com : A�adir bit�cora al directorio . (Peter posted @ 12:21)

 
NFL-Pre Season
The complete 2004 NFL preseason schedule: Check it:

Monday, August 9 (Hall of Fame Game)	Local Time	Eastern Time
Denver vs. Washington (Canton, OH)	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
WEEK 1 – AUGUST 12 – 16
Thursday, August 12
Atlanta at Baltimore	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Chicago at St. Louis	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Friday, August 13
Kansas City at New York Giants	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
New York Jets at New Orleans	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Philadelphia at New England	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Saturday, August 14
Cincinnati at Tampa Bay	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Jacksonville at Miami	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Pittsburgh at Detroit	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Arizona at Minnesota	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Carolina at Washington	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Cleveland at Tennessee	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Dallas at Houston	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Oakland at San Francisco	5:00p (PT)	8:00p
Indianapolis at San Diego	7:00p (PT)	10:00p
Sunday, August 15
Denver at Buffalo	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Monday, August 16
Seattle at Green Bay	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
WEEK 2 – AUGUST 19-23
Thursday, August 19
New York Giants at Carolina	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Friday, August 20
Baltimore at Philadelphia	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Minnesota at Atlanta	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Tampa Bay at Jacksonville	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Saturday, August 21
Detroit at Cleveland	4:30p (ET)	4:30p
New York Jets at Indianapolis	7:00p (EST)	8:00p
Tennessee at Buffalo	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Houston at Pittsburgh	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
New England at Cincinnati	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Washington at Miami	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
New Orleans at Green Bay	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
San Francisco at Chicago	7:30p (CT)	8:30p
Dallas at Oakland	6:00p (PT)	9:00p
Denver at Seattle	7:00p (PT)	10:00p
San Diego at Arizona	7:00p (MST)	10:00p
Monday, August 23
St. Louis at Kansas City	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
WEEK 3 – AUGUST 26-30
Thursday, August 26
Pittsburgh at Philadelphia	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Friday, August 27
Washington at St. Louis	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
New York Giants at New York Jets	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Green Bay at Jacksonville	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
San Francisco at Minnesota	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
New Orleans at Chicago	7:30p (CT)	8:30p
Houston at Denver	7:00p (MT)	9:00p
Seattle at San Diego	7:00p (PT)	10:00p
Saturday, August 28
New England at Carolina	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Miami at Tampa Bay	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Cincinnati at Atlanta	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Buffalo at Indianapolis	7:00p (EST)	8:00p
Cleveland at Kansas City	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Detroit at Baltimore	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Oakland at Arizona	7:00p (MST)	10:00p
Monday, August 30
Tennessee at Dallas	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
WEEK 4 – SEPTEMBER 2-3
Thursday, September 2
Jacksonville at New England	6:45p (ET )	6:45p
Baltimore at New York Giants	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Carolina at Pittsburgh	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Buffalo at Detroit	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Kansas City at Dallas	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Tampa Bay at Houston	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Arizona at Denver	7:00p (MT)	9:00p
Minnesota at Seattle	6:00p (PT)	9:00p
St. Louis at Oakland	7:00p (PT)	10:00p
San Diego at San Francisco	8:00p (PT)	11:00p
Friday, September 3
Atlanta at Washington	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Philadelphia at New York Jets	7:00p (ET)	7:00p
Indianapolis at Cincinnati	7:30p (ET)	7:30p
Chicago at Cleveland	8:00p (ET)	8:00p
Green Bay at Tennessee	7:00p (CT)	8:00p
Miami at New Orleans	8:00p (ET)	8:00p

(Peter posted @ 09:30)

 
College Team Pages
Team Pages (Peter posted @ 09:09)

 
Collegefootballnews.com
Collegefootballnews.com (Peter posted @ 09:02)